Was this helpful?
Thumbs UP Thumbs Down

Waymo and Tesla compete for self-driving dominance

Waymo autonomous driving car fleet
A shot of a male driver sitting back and relaxing as the car navigates in self-driving mode.

Two paths to a driverless world

Waymo, which is part of Google’s parent company, Alphabet, and Tesla are using different methods to achieve self-driving. Public filings and independent analyses indicate Waymo’s rider-only miles totaled 32.3 million by end-Q3 2025.

Tesla aims for all its standard customer cars to become fully self-driving using its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software. Tesla has a fleet of over 6 million vehicles on the road that collect real-world driving data, providing a vast amount of information for its AI training.

Waymo logo displayed on a phone

Different sensors, different tech tools

Building upon their different paths, the primary difference lies in their use of sensors. Waymo equips its vehicles with multi-sensor suites, lidars, radars, and dozens of cameras to create a 360° view.

Waymo’s LiDAR sensors create a 3D picture by emitting millions of laser pulses. Tesla relies mainly on a vision-only system using only cameras to “see.” Tesla’s system is trained on vast amounts of data using a robust neural network and an AI inference chip to make real-time driving decisions.

A man is following GPS directions on his phone while driving

Geo-fencing and Waymo’s map plan

This difference in hardware leads Waymo to rely on pre-created, highly detailed High-Definition (HD) Maps of its operating areas. These maps provide location accuracy to within 10 centimeters (approximately 4 inches) of the car’s exact position on the road.

Because of this, Waymo’s robotaxis are limited to specific, pre-mapped zones, known as geo-fenced areas. By September 2025, Waymo’s cumulative rider-only miles in California had reached 32.3 million. Tesla’s FSD system is designed to drive anywhere without strictly needing these HD maps.

Waymo autonomous driving car fleet

Waymo’s established robotaxi service

Operating within those geo-fenced areas, Waymo was one of the first companies to launch a driverless taxi service to the public in Phoenix, Arizona, in 2020.

As of November 2025, Waymo operates commercially in Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Austin; additional city launches depend on regulatory approvals.

Waymo reports expanding rider-only operations and freeway capabilities; specific weekly paid-ride totals and cumulative paid-trip counts are sourced from the primary company or regulator.

Autonomous car is self-driving while the driver operates a laptop

Tesla’s full self-driving (supervised)

While Waymo focuses on a taxi fleet, Tesla offers its Full Self-Driving (FSD) as a Level 2 driver assistance system for customers, which means the human driver must always be ready to take over. Tesla’s FSD system is trained on over 100 years of anonymous, real-world driving scenarios from its large vehicle fleet.

In November 2025, Tesla began rolling out FSD Version 14.2, which features an upgraded neural network vision encoder. This update enhances the system’s awareness of objects, such as emergency vehicles and human gestures.

Tesla Cybercab RoboTaxi displayed at a show

The data and safety comparison battle

Comparing their safety, Waymo’s driverless fleet has logged over 125 million miles and reported crash data to the NHTSA. Waymo vehicles crash approximately once every 98,600 miles traveled.

Early data for Tesla’s robotaxi program shows a crash rate of roughly once every 62,500 miles. Waymo’s crash rate is approximately 58% lower than Tesla’s robotaxi crash rate based on initial federal data, suggesting Waymo’s approach is currently safer.

Closeup of Tesla chip

The data and chip advantage battle

The difference in crash rates relates to the underlying technology, where Tesla has an advantage because of the sheer amount of data it collects.

Over 6 million vehicles globally are continuously collecting real-world driving data in a “shadow mode,” which is estimated to generate 50 billion miles of information each year for FSD training.

Waymo, by contrast, relies on a smaller fleet, with a total of around 100 million driverless miles. Tesla also designs its own custom computer chips, known as the AI inference chip, to enhance the FSD software’s performance.

Cropped view of a person's hand counting cash while buying a car.

The cost difference in technology

The hardware differences result in a significant cost difference in technology. Waymo’s high-tech sensor suite, including multiple LiDAR and radar units, was estimated to cost around $12,700 per car in 2024.

In contrast, Tesla’s camera-only hardware was estimated to cost only around $400 per vehicle. This significant cost difference means Waymo’s cars are more expensive to build, but it may also make them safer.

Tesla Motors logo on a red car

The price of Tesla’s FSD access

To offset the development costs, Tesla offers its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software to customers through a monthly subscription fee. The monthly subscription cost for FSD (Supervised) is $99.00 per month.

This subscription model is available to owners who have a vehicle equipped with the required FSD computer version 3.0 or higher. Tesla is making the FSD subscription easier to access by offering a free trial period, hoping that more users will pay monthly and provide crucial driving data.

Waymo self driving vehicle

Waymo’s aggressive expansion in 2026

As Waymo moves toward its business goals, it is planning a significant expansion in 2026, targeting up to 15 new cities. This ambitious growth includes new markets such as Dallas, Detroit, Washington, D.C., and London.

The addition of cities like Minneapolis signals Waymo’s confidence in solving one of the most challenging problems for autonomous cars: navigating harsh winter weather conditions.

This expansion, along with its existing service in five cities, demonstrates the company’s intention to quickly capture a significant share of the robotaxi market.

Phoenix flag

Regulatory approvals and the future

To support this growth, getting government approval is a significant hurdle. Waymo has been operating fully driverless vehicles in Phoenix since 2020, setting a high bar for regulators.

Tesla is catching up on the regulatory front for its ride-hailing service. In November 2025, Tesla obtained an Arizona TNC permit enabling a ride-hailing service; the permit does not authorize driverless operation.

Want to know why Tesla is keeping its self-driving safety info under wraps? Read more in Tesla pushes to keep Robotaxi safety details confidential.

Robotaxi theme with big city lights at night.

The factual robotaxi market size

These efforts show the importance of the robotaxi market. The global robotaxi market was valued at $1.71 billion in 2022. The market is projected to reach over $118.61 billion by 2031, experiencing rapid growth.

The Asia-Pacific region held the largest share of this market, having 25.14% in 2022. The U.S. robotaxi market is separately expected to be worth $3.30 billion by 2027.

Curious who’s leading the autonomous ride race in Texas? Find out in Waymo and Tesla battle for robotaxi dominance in Austin, Texas.

Who will win the race for autonomous cars? Share your take below.

Read More From This Brand:

Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content right here on MSN

If you liked this story, you’ll LOVE our FREE emails. Join today and be the first to get stories like this one

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

This content is FREE for our email subscribers.

Enter your email address to get instant FREE access to all of our content.

Was this helpful?
Thumbs UP Thumbs Down
Prev Next
Share this post

Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!

Send feedback to evsmarts



    We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.

    Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.