8 min read
I know it looks like 3YD but it’s actually BYD it stands for Build Your Dreams
8 min read

Jim Farley, CEO of Ford, didn’t hold back when asked to compare Tesla’s and Waymo’s self-driving systems. At the Aspen Ideas Festival, he made it clear that Ford does not trust Tesla’s camera-only approach to autonomy.
Instead, Farley backed Waymo’s system, which uses LiDAR sensors to better “see” the environment. He said that when you’re a brand like Ford, you have to be cautious with new tech. For him, safety and public trust come first, not just affordability or hype.

Tesla’s cars rely only on cameras and AI, while Waymo adds laser sensors called LiDAR for better object detection. This difference has sparked a big debate in the auto world about which approach is safer.
Farley argued that LiDAR offers better vision in poor weather or low light, where cameras alone might fail. Waymo’s system uses cameras, radar, and LiDAR together, creating a layered safety net. That’s something Ford says Tesla’s setup can’t compete with right now.

Farley’s comments suggest Ford is in no rush to jump on the full autonomy bandwagon. After shutting down its Argo AI venture in 2022, Ford changed direction toward more practical solutions.
Rather than go full driverless, Ford is focused on improving BlueCruise, a system that lets drivers take their hands off the wheel under specific conditions. Farley explained they’re aiming for “high speed, eyes-off” driving, but with safety checks. It’s a cautious but strategic move in the evolving self-driving space.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has been vocal about his “camera-only” approach, even calling LiDAR “lame.” But Farley doesn’t agree. He believes skipping LiDAR could mean skipping safety.
According to Farley, Ford isn’t interested in cutting corners just to reduce costs. While Tesla claims its system is cheaper and easier to scale, Ford argues that driver trust and proven safety are far more important than speed to market. That’s why they favor Waymo’s full-sensor setup.

Musk has said Waymo’s cars are too expensive and built in low numbers, while Tesla’s tech is cheaper and mass-produced. But Farley isn’t convinced that lower cost equals better value.
He pointed out that LiDAR isn’t just an add-on; it’s a key part of making autonomous cars work safely. The extra cost, he says, is worth it if it means better performance in real-world conditions. For Ford, long-term trust beats short-term savings every time.

There were rumors that Ford might license Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) tech. But Farley has now confirmed that those conversations didn’t go anywhere. Simply put, Ford wasn’t sold on Tesla’s vision.
Although the two companies discussed collaboration, Ford didn’t see Tesla’s camera-only approach as a good match. Instead, Farley reaffirmed that Ford wants tech built with redundancy and safety first, not a one-track vision focused on cutting hardware costs or pushing fast releases.

For autonomous cars to become mainstream, the public has to trust them. Farley says this is one reason Ford leans away from Tesla’s approach and toward more proven, sensor-based systems.
He stressed that trust isn’t just about what the car can do on paper; it’s about how it performs in unpredictable real-world moments. A sensor blind spot during a foggy night could be a dealbreaker, and Ford doesn’t want to take that risk lightly.

Tesla’s robotaxi has hit the streets in Austin, but there’s still a safety driver in the front seat. That fact alone shows the tech isn’t yet fully ready for prime time.
Despite Musk’s bold promises, Tesla’s system is still under investigation for erratic driving behavior. Ford sees this as further proof that skipping LiDAR might not be the right move. Farley believes full autonomy should only be launched when it can be trusted completely.

Cameras struggle in rain, fog, and glare, conditions drivers deal with often. LiDAR, which uses lasers to map surroundings, can work better in these tough environments.
Farley said this ability is a key reason Ford leans on Waymo’s model. When visibility drops, people want a car that still sees. Tesla’s reliance on vision alone may put it at a disadvantage in the real world, where the weather doesn’t always cooperate.

Farley made it clear that Ford is building tech for real streets, not just lab tests. The focus is on how the system handles real traffic, unpredictable weather, and chaotic situations.
He said drivers expect the same dependability from automation that they expect from Ford’s other vehicles. That means not rushing out half-finished features, even if competitors do. Ford is betting that building trust and working with proven partners like Waymo will pay off in the long run.

Instead of jumping straight into full autonomy, Ford is upgrading its BlueCruise system. It allows hands-free driving on highways while keeping drivers alert and engaged.
This step-by-step approach gives Ford time to test features and build confidence. Farley says the goal isn’t just getting attention; it’s building something people will actually use safely and comfortably. BlueCruise offers real value now, without making risky promises about full autonomy just yet.

Ford once invested $1 billion in Argo AI, a self-driving company it started with Volkswagen. But by 2022, they ended the program and decided to pursue a different route.
Farley explained that fully building autonomous tech in-house wasn’t realistic at this stage. The move showed Ford’s willingness to adapt. Now, instead of competing alone, they’re teaming up with companies like Waymo, which already has tested, advanced systems.

Elon Musk argues that camera-only self-driving is cheaper and easier to scale. He believes the high cost of LiDAR makes it unsustainable in mass-market vehicles.
But Farley disagrees. He says low cost should never come at the expense of safety and trust. For Ford, saving money by removing sensors is like removing seatbelts to make cars lighter; it’s just not worth it if it increases risk.

Farley put to rest the idea that Ford would license Tesla’s Full Self-Driving tech. While talks happened, he confirmed that Ford will not move forward with it.
He noted that while Tesla and Waymo have both made strides, Ford believes in layered systems like Waymo’s. Tesla’s tech may look impressive in demos, but Farley says Ford needs real-world proof before trusting it with customer safety.

Waymo has been focusing on ride-hailing with fully autonomous vehicles in select cities. That slow but steady method aligns with Ford’s safety-first values.
Unlike Tesla, which aimed to make every customer’s car autonomous, Waymo launched in controlled zones with extensive testing. Farley believes this model proves reliability before wide-scale rollout, making it easier to gain public trust over time.
Don’t let the looks fool you—these 10 sedans may seem mild, but they roar like a Mustang GT.

Farley summed it up best, saying Ford found a cooler challenge than urban autonomy: high-speed, eyes-off driving. That is where the company is placing its bets.
By focusing on comfort, safety, and long-term dependability, Ford is playing the long game. Rather than making headlines, it’s aiming to make systems people trust, buy, and keep using. For Farley, that’s the future worth investing in.
Toyota’s latest innovation could drive gas-guzzlers off the road—for good.
Team Tesla or Team Waymo? Comment below and tap like!
Read More From This Brand:
Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content right here on MSN.
If you liked this article, you’ll LOVE our free email newsletter.
This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.

Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!