7 min read
I know it looks like 3YD but it’s actually BYD it stands for Build Your Dreams
7 min read

Tesla fans were stunned when rumors spread that the board was looking to replace CEO Elon Musk. The news came from a Wall Street Journal report, claiming that top executives quietly contacted search firms.
Tesla and Musk denied everything. Tesla and Musk denied the report, calling it ‘absolutely false. But people are still talking. Why? Because Tesla had a rocky year. The timing of this report feels too real to ignore.

Tesla’s stock price has been sliding, and sales aren’t what they used to be. As if that weren’t enough, investors have started worrying about Musk’s attention being focused more on politics than electric cars.
That shift may have spooked the board into action. According to sources, some members began thinking the company needed a change at the top. Even the idea of losing Musk was enough to rattle markets. He’s not just the CEO, he’s part of Tesla’s identity.

Musk announced plans to refocus on Tesla and reduce his political engagements. That wasn’t just casual talk; it felt like a direct response to the board’s concerns.
Musk even said he’d only spend “a day or two” each week on government work. Investors took note. For some, it was reassuring. For others, it raised more questions.

The Tesla board chair said no CEO search ever happened, calling the rumor “absolutely false.” Musk also slammed the report, calling it unethical journalism.
But Tesla’s history of denying reports hasn’t aged well. They denied canceling a $25,000 EV, only to later say it wasn’t happening unless it was a robotaxi. Same story with China’s FSD software trial, first denied, then launched. So now, even when Tesla says “it’s not true,” people second-guess it.

Vineet Mehta, a Tesla veteran of 17 years, recently left the company. That’s not just a name on a list, he helped shape Tesla’s battery tech from the start.
In 2022, he was considered one of Musk’s potential successors. Now he’s gone, joining a line of other leaders like Drew Baglino and JB Straubel, who’ve already moved on. These aren’t minor exits. When key minds walk away, it leaves a big gap.

Tesla board chair Robyn Denholm has sold off most of her Tesla shares. That’s not illegal, but the timing raised a lot of questions.
Over the past decade, she made more than $600 million from Tesla stock. Now, as things get shaky, she’s pulling out. It’s not a great message to send employees or investors. Especially when regular workers are told to “hold tight” and believe in the company.

Tesla’s stock performance, leadership changes, and public statements are starting to worry investors. It’s no longer just about the numbers, it’s about trust.
When key figures leave and big decisions seem rushed, people who’ve invested time and money want answers. Denials only go so far. Investors are used to risk, but they also want stability. Tesla used to be seen as a forward-moving force. Now, it feels a bit shaky.

Ford just canceled something called FNV4, a next-gen system meant to power future vehicles. It wasn’t a car, it was the tech brain for all of them.
Ford invested heavily in this project to enhance software updates and vehicle intelligence. But after delays and rising costs, the whole thing was scrapped. That’s a major reset. Ford says it’ll use what it learned, but starting over means falling behind. In today’s fast-moving EV world, that’s a big risk.

FNV4 wasn’t just some fancy code. It was Ford’s hope to create software-defined vehicles, cars that can improve over time, like Teslas do.
It would’ve reduced wiring, sped up updates, and saved money. Without it, Ford now has to rely on older systems while trying to modernize on the fly. That’s a tough spot. Legacy carmakers already struggle to match Tesla’s tech. Losing FNV4 means that the gap might get even wider.

FNV4 was a huge investment. Some employees say Ford spent between $10 billion and $15 billion on it, more than most startups even raise.
That’s money Ford can’t get back. Now, the company is shifting focus to a lower-cost EV platform called CE1. It’s a different kind of gamble. Ford says it’s still aiming to modernize, but with FNV4 gone, it’s lost years of work and momentum.

Trade policies are changing fast, especially with the return of Donald Trump’s tariff threats. That’s making automakers hit pause on planning.
Companies like GM, Mercedes-Benz, Stellantis, and Volvo have all pulled their financial forecasts. They just can’t predict costs or outcomes. Tariffs can raise prices, change supply chains, and throw off production schedules. Automakers are being cautious.

It’s not just one or two brands; more than 40 companies worldwide have now backed off their yearly outlooks. The cause? Trade policy whiplash.
In Europe and the U.S., CEOs are calling the situation “chaotic.” They’re not just guessing anymore, they’re staying silent. Even Volkswagen added a note saying its forecast didn’t include U.S. tariffs. That says a lot. Auto companies like numbers.

Elon Musk is more than Tesla’s CEO, he’s the brand itself. But if he stepped away, who could really take the wheel?
Names like JB Straubel once made sense, but he’s long gone. Other leaders have left too. The company hasn’t named a clear successor. That’s risky. A strong backup plan gives investors peace of mind. Tesla doesn’t seem to have one, or if it does, it’s keeping quiet.

Tesla used to be the cool tech company changing the world. Now, more people are starting to see it differently.
Critics point to Musk’s political activity and say it’s hurting the brand. Even Tesla’s own earnings report blamed poor public sentiment on outside factors. But some wonder if that’s just an excuse. Public opinion matters.

Tesla has been talking about robotaxis and Full Self-Driving for years. But progress has been slow, and timelines keep shifting.
These are huge bets with big potential payoffs, but also big risks. Investors want results. So far, FSD still needs human supervision, and the robotaxi dream remains a dream. If leadership is distracted or unsettled, these projects could fall even further behind.
Curious how Tesla’s other big bets are doing? Check out what’s going on with the Cybertruck sales struggle.

Employees are starting to feel the pressure. With top leaders leaving and rumors flying, it’s hard to feel secure.
Some insiders say the vibe is tense, and people are looking for stability. That’s tough to come by when your CEO is stretched thin and your board’s actions are unclear. Even for a company built on disruption, this level of uncertainty feels different.
Want to see what else might be shaking employee confidence? Take a look at why Tesla’s U.S. market share is slipping.
Do you think Musk’s political focus is hurting Tesla? Let us know what you think.
Read More From This Brand:
Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content right here on MSN.
If you liked this article, you’ll LOVE our free email newsletter.
This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.
This content is FREE for our email subscribers.
Enter your email address to get instant FREE access to all of our content.
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.
Into cars, EVs, and the future of driving? Get free updates on the latest news, reviews, and tips, no junk, just pure driving goodness!
Unsubscribe anytime. We don't spam!

Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!