How touchscreens are changing in-car controls

Touchscreens are taking over car controls

For features like media, navigation, and climate control that were previously managed by separate buttons and knobs, many contemporary cars now rely on central touchscreens. What used to be a quick twist of a dial now requires digging through layers of on-screen menus.

Instead of making things easier, these screens often become a distraction. Taking your eyes off the road to change a setting can feel risky. Drivers want technology that fits smoothly into their routine, not something that slows them down or adds stress.

Voice controls: improving, but reliability varies

Voice assistants aim to simplify tasks, and recognition has improved in recent years, but driver experiences still vary: some systems handle common commands well, like Amazon Echo Auto, while others frequently require repeats or fallback to manual control. Instead of feeling helpful, the system ends up slowing things down.

When voice control fails, drivers return to tapping screens or pressing buttons anyway. That defeats the purpose of having hands-free features. If a tool doesn’t work consistently, it adds more stress than convenience, especially while on the move.

Drivers miss real buttons

Real buttons gave drivers a fast, familiar way to control features without looking. Their placement was easy to remember, and muscle memory made them reliable. Now, drivers have to tap flat glass surfaces, hoping they hit the right icon.

This shift has taken away confidence behind the wheel. When you need to act quickly, tapping through a screen doesn’t feel safe. Drivers aren’t asking to go backward; they just want something that feels dependable and quick to use.

Older drivers struggle with modern tech

Research by the AAA Foundation and university partners found that older drivers (55–75) took several seconds longer on average to complete common infotainment tasks, indicating that complex HMI designs can disproportionately challenge older users. Features hidden in screens often go unused because they’re hard to find.

This has made some feel left behind by newer vehicles. Cars should be welcoming to everyone, not just tech-savvy users. The simpler the interface, the more drivers can enjoy their vehicle without worry or hesitation.

Too many steps for basic tasks

Adjusting your seat, turning on heated mirrors, or finding the radio should be simple. Instead, drivers are digging through multiple menus to get to one function. That’s not just frustrating; it takes your attention off the road.

Technology is supposed to make things smoother, not add extra steps. Drivers don’t want to think about how many screens to press. They want controls that feel natural and work instantly, just like they used to.

Touchscreens increase distractions

Physical buttons offered a safer alternative by allowing quick, no-look actions. The more a driver has to think about a task, the more distracted they become. Safety should always come before sleek design or digital convenience.

Because they are visual and manual, touchscreens often require drivers to take their eyes off the road; safety groups and hands-on tests show some touchscreen tasks demand substantially more glance time than equivalent physical controls. This leads to greater chances of missing something important ahead.

Driver-assistance can overdo it

Systems like adaptive cruise and lane-keeping help in theory, but not everyone finds them useful. Sometimes they brake too early or tug at the wheel without warning. This unexpected behavior can make drivers feel less in control.

Instead of helping, these tools sometimes create anxiety. Drivers prefer knowing exactly how their car will respond. Assistance should be predictable and optional, not something that surprises or second-guesses the driver.

Satisfaction scores are falling

New technology was meant to improve the driving experience, but many customers feel the opposite. Surveys show growing frustration with overly complex systems. Industry surveys, such as J.D. Power’s U.S. Tech Experience Index, have reported recent declines in satisfaction with certain in-car technologies.

This trend shows a real disconnect between drivers and designers. When features are too hard to use, people simply stop using them. That’s not innovation; that’s overcomplication, and it’s hurting brand loyalty.

Cars shouldn’t feel like homework

Learning how to use your car shouldn’t feel like studying for a test. Some owners say it takes days or even weeks to figure out basic controls. That kind of learning curve doesn’t belong in everyday driving.

Drivers want to get in, drive, and feel confident. Overcomplicated menus and hidden settings just create stress. A smart design works naturally, without the need for a manual or constant guessing.

Carmakers starting to listen

After years of adding more screens and menus, some brands are finally listening. Automakers are now reintroducing real buttons for key functions like volume and climate control. It’s a sign they’re taking driver feedback seriously.

This return to simplicity shows that not all progress means going fully digital. Drivers want a balanced mix of smart tech and familiar controls. When design respects both, the experience improves for everyone.

Laws are changing in Europe

European safety bodies and Euro NCAP are updating HMI evaluations and, from 2026, will give favorable ratings to vehicles that retain physical controls for critical functions (wipers, indicators, hazard lights), a change expected to influence manufacturer design choices.

These changes could influence car design across the globe. When regulations shift, manufacturers have to adapt. That could mean a safer, simpler driving experience for everyone, no matter where they live.

Buttons win on speed and safety

A button or knob lets you react instantly, even without looking. It’s fast and simple, and you know exactly what it does. That kind of confidence matters, especially in a moving vehicle.

Screens can’t match that feeling of certainty. You tap, wait, and hope it worked as intended. In a moment where seconds count, physical controls are often the safer and smarter choice.

Voice assistants still need work

Most voice systems sound promising but fall short in real use. Drivers report frequent misheard commands or slow responses. It’s frustrating to repeat yourself over and over on the road.

Until voice assistants become more accurate and intuitive, people won’t rely on them. Drivers prefer controls that work the first time. Technology should listen better, respond faster, and never add stress.

Familiar layouts bring confidence

When everything’s in its usual spot, drivers feel in control. Moving key features to unfamiliar places inside screens makes things harder. It’s not just inconvenient; it’s confusing in a critical moment.

Good car design should build trust. Familiarity helps drivers react faster and stay calm under pressure. It’s not about being old-fashioned; it’s about being effective and safe.

Brands are learning from mistakes

After pushing touch-only designs, some brands are shifting direction. Feedback and reviews have made a real difference in how cars are being built. That means more thoughtful, driver-focused interiors are coming back.

This shows how important customer voices can be. When drivers speak up, companies take notice. The goal now is to blend smart features with ease, not overload people with layers of tech.

Discover how much you could save—see how EV maintenance stacks up against gas-powered cars!

Smart doesn’t mean complicated

People like smart features when they work smoothly in the background. They don’t want to dig through five menus to turn on a seat warmer. A smart car should feel simple, not like a puzzle.

Good design should make features easier, not harder, to reach. Less clutter, faster access, and common-sense layouts matter. Drivers want help, not headaches, from the technology in their car.

Speed meets savings: Discover 14 high-performance cars that won’t break the bank!

Team Simple or Team Smart Tech? Drop your thoughts below and hit like.

Read More From This Brand:

• What could happen if all cars were electric vehicles
• How EV maintenance costs compare to gas-powered cars
• Volkswagen and Uber launch autonomous EV taxi service

Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content right here on MSN.

If you liked this article, you’ll LOVE our free email newsletter.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.