Was this helpful?
Thumbs UP Thumbs Down

Chrysler 300 revival rumors spark EV buzz

Chrysler logo
Chrysler 300 c on display

Reports suggest Chrysler 300 could return as an electric sedan

Industry reports say Stellantis may revive the Chrysler 300 name as an electric sedan inspired by the Halcyon concept. Stellantis has not officially confirmed a new Chrysler 300.

The old Chrysler 300 was known for being strong and stylish at the same time. It carried the famous Hemi V-8 engine option and became a cultural hit. Now, Chrysler wants to carry that same mix of class and power into the electric age.

chrysler 300

History kept the 300 alive

The Chrysler 300 has long played an essential role in keeping the company moving. Chrysler filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on April 30, 2009, after the 2008–2009 auto industry crisis. The company later reorganized and continued product work.

Chrysler’s Halcyon concept shows features the brand is testing. The concept includes next-generation Stow ’n Go rear seats that retract into the cargo area, per Stellantis.

Stellantis logo displayed on a board

Why the new sedan matters

Chrysler has few models today, so a revived 300 would help boost its lineup. Some people even called the 300 the “poor man’s Bentley,” since it had luxury looks at a much lower price.

Production of the Chrysler 300 ended in December 2023 at Stellantis’ Brampton Assembly Plant as the plant was retooled. Stellantis says the change was part of its future product and manufacturing plans.

Chrysler Airflow displayed at a museum

Chrysler’s shifting plans

Reports say Stellantis paused Airflow development and that the brand plans a hybrid-first crossover for about 2027. Any sedan return is being reported for a later date, but it is not officially confirmed.

This made Chrysler’s strategy unclear, but bringing back the 300 provides hope for sedan fans. It also shows Chrysler’s interest in staying in the full-size car market, even as crossovers grow more popular.

Turbocharge car engine.

Options for engines and hybrids

Stellantis has moved to a ‘multi-energy’ approach that includes hybrids and EVs. Stellantis has developed a 3.0-L twin-turbo ‘Hurricane’ inline-six and uses eTorque mild-hybrid systems on some V-6 models. Reports say these are among the options Stellantis could use, but no official powertrain list for a new 300 exists.

The Hurricane 3.0-liter turbocharged inline-six offers smoother performance, more power, and better fits the 300’s premium goal. Another possible setup is the eTorque system, used in the Ram 1500, pairing a 3.6-liter Pentastar V-6 with a hybrid battery.

Woman driving a car equipped with active safety systems

Features for tech and range

Industry reporting says a revived 300 could offer all-wheel drive. Stellantis’ STLA Large supports 400- and 800-volt systems; Stellantis also markets STLA Brain, STLA SmartCockpit, and STLA AutoDrive as future software and autonomy building blocks. The exact features and range of a new 300 are not yet official.

If approved, a future Chrysler sedan could leverage Stellantis’ STLA Brain/SmartCockpit/AutoDrive software stack available on the STLA Large platform.

The Stellantis logo displayed on a phone screen, a man holding

Price and release window

Industry chatter (e.g., MotorTrend) pegs a possible base price around $65,000 and an on-sale window in late 2028–2029, but Stellantis hasn’t announced pricing or timing.

The on-sale date is set for fall 2028, giving Stellantis time to prepare for its launch. By then, Chrysler hopes buyers will be more ready for electric sedans. The timing also connects with Stellantis’ bigger plan to reintroduce sedans after first focusing on crossovers.

Bentley car showroom

Chrysler’s concept experiments

Chrysler has often experimented with bold ideas. Chrysler showed the Imperial concept in 2006. The concept used a 5.7-L HEMI V-8 and luxury trim. Chrysler canceled plans to produce the Imperial concept in July 2007 amid fuel-economy and business-case concerns.

The Imperial was huge, luxurious, and designed to look powerful. Chrysler even suggested it would cost far less than a Bentley, making it seem like a bargain luxury car. However, as history shows, despite its eye-catching reveal, the Imperial never went into production.

Close up of Rolls Royce logo on car

Why the Imperial failed

Several factors stopped the Imperial from reaching buyers. In the early 2000s, gas prices were high, and new U.S. fuel rules demanded better efficiency. A giant V-8 sedan was out of step.

Inside Chrysler, leadership also changed when Cerberus Capital took control from Daimler. The new team canceled big rear-wheel-drive sedans to save money. According to Nigel Evans, the public also criticized the design, saying it looked too much like a Rolls-Royce Phantom.

Chrysler logo

The Imperial’s design choices

The Imperial was built on a stretched Chrysler 300C platform and carried a 5.7-liter HEMI V-8. It had a long hood, sharp fender peaks, and rear-hinged “suicide” doors, echoing Bentley and Rolls-Royce designs.

It was nearly 18 feet long and six feet wide, with a taller roofline than the 300C. The styling was bold, but the reception was mixed. Some saw it as a budget Rolls-Royce, while others called it gaudy. The oversized grille and badge drew heavy criticism.

High perspective front corner of Chrysler Imperial’s pillarless 1960s

Inside the Imperial

The interior was just as dramatic. It featured leather, suede, and California burl walnut. The cabin used a two-tone Birch cream and Bay brown design. In the back are two reclining seats with a console next to dual-screen DVD players and wireless headsets.

The front was minimalist with chrome bezels, twin gauges, and a central touchpad. It even had a fixed hub steering wheel where the center controls stayed in place when the wheel turned, an unusual feature likely never meant for production.

Chrysler imperial

Imperial’s performance specs

The Imperial concept used a 5.7-L HEMI V-8 rated at about 340 hp and 390 lb-ft. Chrysler quoted 0–60 mph around 5.5 seconds for the concept; other figures (top speed) are estimates from the time and should be labeled as such.

The car sat on Chrysler’s LY platform, a stretched version of the 300C’s LX chassis. It had a 123-inch wheelbase, 22-inch wheels, independent suspension, and Brembo brakes. Many parts came from Chrysler’s existing models, making production possible.

Bentley

Comparing Imperial to Bentley

The Imperial’s size placed it between Bentley’s Continental Flying Spur and Arnage sedans. It aimed for the Arnage’s commanding presence while trying to match the Flying Spur’s sleek look. Yet reviewers felt it lacked Bentley’s refinement.

The Flying Spur’s fast roofline made it modern and smooth, while the Imperial appeared brash. Up close, its details looked rougher than Bentley’s coach-built finish. Chrysler wanted to capture luxury at a fraction of the price, but critics doubted its polish.

Mitsubishi Motors company logo displayed at a show

Sebring’s weak performance

While the Imperial was too bold, Chrysler also struggled with its Sebring. SUVs rose in popularity, and Chrysler left the midsize sedan space because the Sebring underperformed. According to CarBuzz (2025), it failed to challenge leaders like Camry and Accord.

The Sebring began as a coupe and convertible, built on Mitsubishi underpinnings. The sedan version appeared in 2001 on Chrysler’s JR platform. Despite low prices compared to BMW and Mercedes, it never delivered the excitement or quality needed to compete.

BMW’s new M2 CS shows that the brand is still committed to building driver-focused cars. Read more in BMW M2 CS proves BMW is keeping the driver’s car legacy alive.

chrysler sebring convertible 2001

Sebring’s lasting reputation

The Sebring had engines from 2.0L to 3.5L with 150–235 hp, but no sporty versions. Quality complaints were common, with CarBuzz noting poor interior build and weak driving compared to rivals. Even the final models are sold cheaply in used markets, often under $5,000.

Coupe versions from 2001 to 2007, based on the Mitsubishi Eclipse, also failed. They looked smooth but drove poorly and sold in small numbers. Chrysler dropped the Sebring name in 2010, showing that not every sedan could find lasting success.

Nissan’s budget-friendly EV sedan is now outselling Mazda models in the Chinese market. See details in Nissan’s affordable electric sedan outselling Mazda in the Chinese market.

What’s your take, icon reborn or past rehashed? Drop your thoughts.

Read More From This Brand:

Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content right here on MSN

If you liked this story, you’ll LOVE our FREE emails. Join today and be the first to get stories like this one

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

This content is FREE for our email subscribers.

Enter your email address to get instant FREE access to all of our content.

Was this helpful?
Thumbs UP Thumbs Down
Prev Next
Share this post

Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!

Send feedback to evsmarts



    We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.

    Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.