6 min read
I know it looks like 3YD but it’s actually BYD it stands for Build Your Dreams
6 min read

California lawmakers have decisively dismissed Senate Bill 712, which would have exempted pre-1981 collector vehicles with historical plates and collector insurance from smog checks.
Known as “Leno’s Law,” the proposal sought to exempt qualified collector vehicles from routine emissions testing, citing their limited use and historical value. Despite bipartisan support and backing from Jay Leno, the Assembly Appropriations Committee shelved the bill in late August 2025.

Jay Leno, famed car enthusiast and collector, publicly championed the bill, emphasizing how current smog-check rules are outdated for collector vehicles. He argued that these cars’ infrequent use and proper maintenance make strict testing unnecessary.
Leno stressed the importance of preserving automotive heritage while aligning California’s rules with other states that have already eased the requirements for classic vehicles.

Senate Bill 712, as amended, would have exempted vehicles built before 1981, with historical plates and collector-car insurance, from biennial and transfer smog checks starting Jan. 1, 2027, with the cutoff advancing one model year each year from 2028 through 2032.
The bill intended to reduce the burden on classic car owners who often drive these vehicles sparingly and maintain them meticulously. Supporters believed this exemption would protect the state’s automotive history without significantly impacting air quality.

Environmental groups and state regulators voiced strong opposition to the bill. They argued that exempting older vehicles from smog checks could undermine California’s ambitious air quality goals.
According to the Assembly Appropriations fiscal analysis, CARB estimated ongoing costs of about $1.2 million per year to analyze emissions impacts and update air-quality models. These concerns influenced lawmakers to prioritize environmental health over exemption requests.

The rejection of SB 712 was met with disappointment from classic car enthusiasts and collectors across California. Many see the existing smog-check requirements as unnecessarily harsh and costly for vehicles driven only occasionally.
The community argues that these cars represent cultural heritage and deserve regulatory consideration that acknowledges their unique status compared to daily-use vehicles.

Current rules remain in effect: gasoline vehicles 1975 model year or older are exempt from smog checks, while 1976-and-newer vehicles (including many collector cars) must test.
Owners of these classic cars must still navigate costly and sometimes challenging emissions testing processes. This has led some enthusiasts to reconsider registering their vehicles or to limit usage to avoid compliance costs.

Many classic car owners view smog checks as a burden that doesn’t reflect their vehicle’s limited driving use. They argue that emissions testing designed for modern cars is ill-suited for older engines, which may face difficulties meeting standards despite proper maintenance.
This mismatch contributes to frustration and resistance toward California’s current testing requirements.

Beyond this bill, Jay Leno has long advocated for preserving automotive history. His classic vehicles and public commentary collection highlight the importance of balancing environmental concerns with protecting cultural heritage.
Leno’s support for SB 712 fits within his wider efforts to update laws affecting car enthusiasts and maintain public interest in classic automobiles.

While SB 712 enjoyed bipartisan sponsorship, it ultimately faced resistance due to environmental and budgetary concerns. The Assembly Appropriations Committee’s decision reflected careful weighing of these factors, highlighting the ongoing tension between regulatory goals and special interest groups.
The bill’s failure underscores the complexity of legislating in areas where economic, cultural, and environmental interests intersect.

Several other states have enacted exemptions or relaxed smog-check rules for classic or collector cars. Supporters of SB 712 pointed to these precedents to argue for California to modernize its approach.
Opponents, however, emphasized California’s unique air quality challenges, suggesting that policies successful elsewhere may not be appropriate or feasible in the Golden State.

The continued requirement for smog checks affects the financial calculus for classic car owners, who must budget for potentially costly testing and repairs.
This economic burden can discourage hobbyists from registering or restoring classic vehicles, impacting local businesses related to vintage car sales, maintenance, and events. The bill’s failure leaves these economic concerns unresolved.

Supporters of the bill argued that infrequent use of classic cars means their overall emissions impact is minimal. Opponents countered that even small emissions increases, given California’s population and air quality issues, can add up.
This debate reflects the challenge of balancing environmental protection with individual freedoms and cultural preservation.

CARB’s estimate that managing the bill’s provisions would cost $1.2 million annually contributed to the hesitance among lawmakers. Administrative expenses tied to new exemptions include tracking eligible vehicles, enforcing compliance, and updating regulations.
These financial concerns weighed heavily in rejecting SB 712 despite its widespread support among enthusiasts.

Though SB 712 was rejected, the debate over classic car smog exemptions will likely continue. Advocates may pursue future legislation or regulatory adjustments to ease requirements without compromising air quality.
Continued dialogue between lawmakers, environmental groups, and the automotive community will be essential in crafting balanced policies.

California’s air quality and emissions reduction leadership remains a priority, and maintaining strict smog-check rules reflects this commitment.
While the bill’s rejection disappoints some, it aligns with broader state objectives to reduce pollution and combat climate change. The decision signals that environmental health takes precedence over easing regulations for niche vehicle categories.
Curious how coverage issues could affect new owners? Dive into Tesla Cybertruck, which faces challenges with insurance coverage.

Owners of classic cars must continue following existing smog-check rules, including biennial emissions testing. They are encouraged to maintain their vehicles meticulously to pass inspections and seek out specialized mechanics experienced with vintage engines.
Additionally, owners can explore available waivers or hardship provisions, but must remain vigilant about evolving regulations.
Want to see how gaming tech is shaping self-driving cars? Explore Tesla’s use of Unreal Engine to enhance FSD visualizations.
What do you think this means for California classic car culture? Could you drop your comments below?
Read More From This Brand:
Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content right here on MSN
This slideshow was made with AI assistance and
This content is FREE for our email subscribers.
Enter your email address to get instant FREE access to all of our content.
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.
Into cars, EVs, and the future of driving? Get free updates on the latest news, reviews, and tips, no junk, just pure driving goodness!
Unsubscribe anytime. We don't spam!

Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!